![[ABD Logo]](../images/logo8050.gif)
The Association of British Drivers
![]() A Warwickshire talivan collecting money on the A5 at Dordon between Atherstone and the M42 (Map). This section of road, which is built up on only one side, has been reduced to 50mph; and an excessive number of traffic islands prevent any overtaking, now they want to lower the limit to 40mph. No prizes for guessing why. ©Pro-Motor Ltd 2004 |

The perfectly good rural dual-carriageway between the M42 and Dordon currently has a temporary 50mph limit — until a few years ago it was NSLA. The stretch between the traffic lights and Dordon limit will be made permanent; though in an amazing burst of common sense, the stretch between the M42 and the traffic lights will go back to NSLA.
The 50mph section between Dordon and Grendon is to be reduced to 40mph. This is a favourite spot for their Talivan and the proposal is clearly intended as a money raising exercise. Strangely the speed camera van has not been seen here for some weeks. Expect to see it back if the speed limit drops to 40mph, so they can catch all those dangerous drivers travelling at the reckless speed of 50mph.|
Source: National Statistics — Road Casualties in Great Britain 2004: Coventry Evening Telegraph |
| Dear Sirs HOW MANY MORE HAVE TO DIE AT RYTON BEFORE THEY STOP PLAYING GAMES WITH CAMERAS? The comments made by Camera Partnership man Stephen Rumble about the A45 Ryton cameras (11 Aug) were both revealing and disturbing. They show how weak the link is between road safety and the use of speed cameras, and point the way to why real safety improvements are not happening on Britain's roads. Justifying the three eastbound fixed cameras, Rumble had this to say: "The first two cameras (coming into Coventry) are there for an obvious reason - to protect people turning to cross the A45. The third camera by the Ryton plant was put in because of a number of collisions happening where the slip road joins the A45."Since both the speed limit of 50mph and the safety "solution" of a camera before the junction are the same in both locations, Mr Rumble must therefore believe that a slip road joining a dual carriageway is equally as dangerous as a turning such as Ryton, which has traffic turning across the main flow! This is patently absurd, and I defy Mr Rumble to produce details of any accident that happened because a driver on the A45 was doing 60mph instead of 50mph at the site of this third camera. If he can't, this camera should be removed, or the limit increased until he can demonstrate that someone breaking it can cause a credible hazard. If the authorities can't see any difference between a slip road and a conventional junction, then its no wonder they are dragging their heels over the real solution to the Ryton Junction blackspot — a proper junction with slip roads. The truly outrageous fact is that this whole sorry drama has already been played out on the A45 to the west of Coventry. Speed limits were reduced and cameras were placed where traffic could turn across the central reservation. But all of these openings were subsequently closed off because, just like at Ryton, all the cameras can achieve is for careless drivers to hit each other at still fatal speeds. Of course, the cameras remain, using accidents that can't happen anymore to justify their useless existance. Mr Rumble sinks even deeper into the mire when he tries to justify the use of camera vans between the fixed camera locations: "We are aware that some people get used to where the fixed cameras are and surf between them. We want to encourage people to slow down all the time. It is just that extra level to encourage people to stick to the limit."This is a clear admission that mobile camera vans are nothing to do with safety. Lets look at the facts. The national speed limit for dual carriageways is 70mph. This has been reduced to 50mph on this stretch because of accidents at the junctions. Fixed cameras have been placed at all the junctions, where the accidents have happened. Thats the full extent of the road safety basis for Mr Rumble's argument, so that should be the end of the story. But it isnt. The cat is out of the bag — Rumble has admitted that they are enforcing the completely unnecessary 50mph limit between the fixed camera locations purely for its own sake. Its nothing to do with safety — and you heard it from his own lips. If the authorities want to rebuild their lost credibility with the motoring public, they need to take the following actions: 1 Reinstate the 70mph limit from where the bend unwinds to the west of the Ryton junctions to the roundabout. 2 End the use of mobile cameras on this stretch 3 Instigate the immediate upgrade of the Ryton junction to eliminate the black spot, with the fixed cameras and 50 limit being removed on completion. Nigel Humphries National Media Spokesman Association of British Drivers |
![]() This camera on the A5 Eastbound just before the A444 junction has been set up to catch HGVs doing more than 40mph. |
![]() This Truvelo speed camera appeared on the A446 in April 2004. |
![]() The Birch Coppice junction on the A5 was to be the test site for new PolTec combined red light and speed cameras, only PolTec have gone bust. Oh dear, how sad, never mind. |
Elsewhere on the ABD website:|
Adjacent local areas |